A blog about dreams. If you have had any of the experiences listed in this blog and feel the information is of value; please share, digg, facebook, email the material to help others. This blog strives for the highest quality of knowledge for the topics at hand.
Wednesday, January 5, 2022
Improving Dream Fidelity and Five Sensory-Replay through attention focusing and training
Why healthy sleep is important for learning, memory, cognitive health, and dreams.
Thursday, January 15, 2015
The Continuing Saga of Winning at the Casino with the Law-of-Attraction
Managed to get a nice little win, so set $150 of it aside as per my tuck-away rule. Then decided to just go for it on the last $100 with bigger bets and voila on the 5th spin another $1000 win. So... took the money and ran. Based on my system this is where frequency becomes important. I'm just going to relax, enjoy the money and take a break.
To you who said you just wave your magic little wand... still want to reconsider?
To read about the system and see why I believe law-of-attraction is helping, here's the full story.
http://you-are-dreaming.blogspot.ca/2015/01/winning-at-casino-with-law-of-attraction.html
To read about today's fun success:
http://you-are-dreaming.blogspot.ca/2015/01/continuation-of-winning-at-casino-with.html
Continuation of Winning at the Casino with Law of Attraction.
I still stick to a strict $20-$50 system and today as it's a payday so I budget $50 I managed to have another success so thought I would share.
To see the full examples see this blog-page: http://you-are-dreaming.blogspot.ca/2015/01/winning-at-casino-with-law-of-attraction.html
Here is a sreencap of the win with the January 15th, 2014 timestamp in the photo. Using my system, I only had $50 and lucky for me it paid on the last $5 before I would have walked. I took the payment, cashed out and left. I'll try my luck again in two weeks following the frequency rule covered in the above article. I stuck to the leave on a big win rule and walked away a winner.
Now I'll take a nice 2 week break and enjoy some extra cash. Thanks Law of Attraction you mysterious yet wonderful phenomena!
Ian
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Winning at the Casino with the Law of Attraction
Before I completely gave up however, I thought maybe it's also my attitude. I couldn't count the times that I would go, sit at a machine and someone next to me would have a nice win. I knew winning at least something over $150 was possible but I didn't understand why that wasn't me sitting at that machine having more fun. So I turned to thought-manifestation as my course of action using the Law of Attraction.
Instead of just going and loosing as per normal; the first change that I made was simple, I sat down and closed my eyes. I thought, “I am allowing myself to win at the casino. I want to know what it's like to win a $600 or greater. I would like to experience being a winner.” and I would mentally visualize a machine giving me a payout and I let go of this thought.
Well, for the first time in December 2013 right before Christmas, I won $1,200 and it paid for my Christmas that year. I was elated, the money I wasted in Vegas I finally won back. I couldn't believe it because for over 5 years of losses and minimal gains the Casino finally gave me a taste of what it was like to win at least something. Unfortunately, no picture of this win but when I started to win in 2014 it was absolutely outstanding so when I could remember I would take a picture or video. I've never experienced anything like this. These types of wins started to rain in like mana from heaven compared to all previous years. What changed wasn't my playstyle, it wasn't the amount of money I took for my bank roll... it was my attitude and the Law of Attraction.
Statistically comparing 2014 to all combined years of playing I've never seen anything like it. Keep in mind, my bankroll ranges from $20 to $50 when I go. I've made a couple mistakes at the Casino lost $600 at Vegas, one night when I was on budget bumped into a friend so we started to have a race to the bottom and instead of my bankroll I lost $400 on reckless playing so school of hard knocks lessons learned and made me stick to my simple system. The good news is that these losses have long since been recovered plus more after using the law of attraction.
Let's look at the results
Here are some samples as I did not take pictures of all of the wins, but most of them so from nothing up to 2014 to these results... they speak for themselves. And I'll add in all the tips and strategies at the end of the images.
Screen shot for TimeStamps on Images
I pulled the images off my phone so you could see the time stamps all in 2014.
February 22, 2014
This was a really fun win mostly because it was a $20 bankroll that I managed to win some start-up money on the penny machines which then grew into a this pot, so payout of $985.50 with a take-home of $965.50. I was quite happy about this one.
February 28, 2014
I waited almost a week from the first win and took in $50 and won $817 so took home $767.
March 19, 2014 - The Money Tree $2720.00
My Birthday was on March 15th, but my birthday present came a few days later. I didn't have my phone so I had to count it out and take a picture for prosperity. This was another win on a $50 bankroll so $2670, it was a very quick in and out because I hit the jackpot just as the attendant walked over and greeted me then bang, right in front of her it hits. I cashed out, ran out and took some time away from the casino to enjoy the winnings.
May 15, 2014
This was another really good example of taking in $20 where I first started on a penny machine to see if I could get some play money, then took the play money to this machine and won $1526.25 less $20 so $1506.25 take home. That strategy is covered below.
July 20, 2014
My brother-in-law wanted to try my system with me so we went with $40 each and I don't know if it's having someone else's energy there but if I go with other people... I loose. So I tend to like to go by myself and I'll explain that also why I think that is. So we go to the casino and each of us loose. I had $20 left in my budget that I was willing to spend so went back later that evening by myself on $20. I manage to get my start-up and walked over to this machine to see if that would grow and viola. $1204 less $100 was a nice $1104 take home. I gave my brother-in-law and sister $300 because I'm a nice guy and he couldn't believe it.
December 20, 2014
There were some more wins between July and December, I didn't take pictures as they were mid-range wins, and there were also losses. Christmas shopping had me tapped but I had some extra money after all the xmas shopping and wanted to try an experiment linked again to a request I made using thought-manifestation and the law of attraction. To make it work, I had to bump my budget so I took in $200, but I had a very good feeling about it. I also changed my max bet amount which on a dollar machine is $5. I just wanted to see if I could make a bigger bet, if it would pay and as luck or LOA would have it... won my single largest amount to date. $2,795 - $200 = $2,595 and this December was really amazing I had some more wins.
December 22, 2014
Now that I had that nice Xmas present, I took $50 from the winnings and played on this machine by the time I was down $25 hit the bonus and had a $1591 win with $25 in the machine so $1,566 take home.
As you can see... for years I couldn't win a damn thing but with a change of attitude, using the law-of-attraction and sticking to a very strict playing system I've finally had some fun at the wretched Casino. Now I know what it feels like to be a winner. I can sleep better knowing that it wasn't that I couldn't win rather my attitude was not letting me win.
Most people don't understand thought-manifestation nor do they believe that the law-of-attraction works. It's something you need to see to believe. If you can produce results with it and see it working then it certainly becomes more believable. As in this case with the frequency of these wins in 2014 vs all other years. If it did anything, it seemed to affect the probability of winning to be more favourable then how it was prior to this experiment.
One thing is certain, it doesn't mean you magically win all the time. What I am pointing out is that up until this point in my usual casino routine I never saw these types of wins. The goal of having more tangible wins is noted in the results.
Before I cover the Law-of-Attraction angle, I do have a strict system that I've used to moderate my spending at the casino. I'll cover that system first as I think it's very common-sense and practical if you want to test your luck at one-armed bandits. As per my lessons learned with a couple of large sums lost totalling $1,000. It doesn't matter what you walk in with. If you are going to lose, you'll lose it all so this is why the system is better than nothing at all. It minimizes losses and maximizes gain as a philosophy. I've stuck to this for years and when I stray, I pay.
My Casino System
Small Budget
The most important thing is budget. My budget fluctuates from $20 to $50 before I walk out of the casino. Live by that budget or don't play. It's not worth risking anything more in my opinion.Low Frequency
The next important thing is frequency. Less is best! The less you go to a Casino, the better. My budget allows that I can afford to loose up to $50 a paycheck if things are not working out, but I don't like to loose any more than that. The frequency must fit your budget, excess frequency equals greater spending and larger losses, not bigger wins.Play on Startup
Why this small budget system works for me is the first goal has always been to win small so I can play on that start-up money to win big. It is this strategy that has allowed a $20 budget to bloom to over $1,000.The idea of the start-up is that you want to win some play-money at the casino first. This can let you tuck away your bankroll and try to grow on Casino money, not your own. Quite often I'll walk into a casino, say hi to the doorman and in a five minutes I am walking back saying goodbye and they always comment about how quick that was. That happens when I loose $20 with no hint of a win. If it's 10 minutes I probably was on my $50 bankroll and didn't hit my brake.
The start-up part of my strategy comes from years of loosing learning it doesn't matter what your budget is. If you play on your money, you'll lose your money. It's a casino right?
Don't Spend Your Bankroll
The idea of the start-up is to exceed by either doubling or greater the bankroll. If you succeed don't ever spend the bankroll to minimize loses and maximize gains. Again, common-sense and it's always nice to leave with the money you came in with if you gamble.Fractionalize The Start-up
Just because you have some start-up casino money doesn't mean it should all be spent. On low amounts it's understandable I don't cry if I double my bankroll and then walk out with just the bankroll. If you have more than doubled your bankroll, it doesn't make sense to try to loose it all to see if something bigger comes that day. The start-up strategy can give you some play-money but the casino is very adept at taking all that back so knowing that makes this strategy effective in maximizing gains even if they are only +$20.It's easy to play on casino money and forget it's now your money so this is a lesson learned in my earlier years where I would win $100 just to throw it all back in trying to win more. A very poor strategy indeed. Take some home is rewarding.
On moderate wins over $200 or $300 on the start-up run... it's safer to take a fraction of that amount that to play ( I range from 10%-20% ) and keep the majority of it to enjoy. But it does let me take my bankroll from that winning and try again. Why it's worth having a limit always is common-sense but with taking a fraction, I've grown little wins to where the end of the night I've walked out with $1,400 in small wins. So it can grow.
Tuck away the little wins
If you are having a good run, and the start-up money is producing more little wins, keep the fractionalized 10%-20% rule on the next win, set aside the majority. And this is a fun way to play if you are having a good run. I've walked out with $1,400 just on accumulated little wins.Leave on any big win
If you have a big win, even on the start-up phase just leave. I hit the exit on all big wins, it just let me keep all of it. I like walking away a winner. If you can't then fractionalize and leave if the fraction is spent, don't keep spending.Just remember this rule - stay and play and it will take it away.
Frequency equals loss at a Casino, it's a no brainer but for my system I like to have that right in front of me. Get any kind of big-pot win it's best to leave and enjoy that money. No sense winning if you are just going to spend it there so the final tip is walk away a winner!
Other little strategies include what I call a break. I usually do this if I have $50 and don't want to loose it all. If the first $25 is all loss, I'll cut my losses and leave until the next time I get paid. Generally if it's $20 I don't break at $10. The reason to have a break is when you do have a nice win, and you want to play on some of that winnings for example. I win $600 and put $500 away so now I have $100 to play on. But by $50 down if it's not paying back I break and leave. So the break strategy is good otherwise it's $100 instead of $50. It's more psychological because I could just say I'm ok with loosing $50 but without a break, I'll lose it. With the break I'll play with fifty, lose $25 and feel good about myself for leaving with $25 and think wonders of myself for doing the right thing.
So the strategy is not about what machine to play, how much to bet it's all about making a little bit of your money and turning it into a lot of casino money. And this comes with making all the dumb mistakes we all do in the beginning. Not having a budget, not respecting the dangers of a casino, thinking a win is just around the corner when it's not. In the end the goal is always to walk away a winner. Even if it's your bankroll or $20...
Casino System Summary
| Small Budget | $20-$50 (break at $50). |
| Low Frequency | Couple times in a month or less if losing. A little more if winning but not much. |
| Play on Startup | Always try to play on Casino money and lock away your budget regardless if start-up is gone. |
| Don't Spend Your Bankroll | Always subtract bankroll from startup. |
| Fractionalize The Start-up | If you have a moderate win, put most of it away and play on a fraction of the start-up. |
| Tuck Away Little Wins | Always put the majority of a win away 10%-20% rule. |
| Leave on Big Wins | On a good win, leave the casino mission accomplished. Take time off and enjoy the extra cash. |
| Have a Break | On start-up or a larger budget leave if you can't win by your break so you at least leave with something. |
| Walk Away A Winner | Always best to leave with money right? Just remember, stay and play and it will take it away. |
No matter what, a Casino isn't there for anyone to make money. I have watched people throw thousands of dollars in a machine just to win a fraction back, then to throw that in and lose it all. I've watched people win a nice mid-range pot only to throw it all back at a machine.
Now on to 2014 with Law-of-attraction and Thought-Manifestation.
Why do I think this is what produced these results? It's the only thing that has changed in the equation. This was a good test for me to see if the law-of-attraction even worked. I needed tangible results not some fluffy belief. Show me the evidence. But I have observed other key points in my life where future events seemed to synchronize with a past desire be it good or bad. Sometimes it was to uncanny to ignore.
The other problem that I have is related to deja-vu. Quite often I've had deja vu but linked the memory to past dreams which were the source of the future events this is known as Deja Reve. What I've done with that is even more amazing then this law-of-attraction experiment. I've written a paper called, "The Theory of Precognitive Dreams" which covers it's history, research, evidence and my own personal experiences with it. If you are in doubts, here is a great news article on the topic with another person who has had it verified many times over.
This precognitive potential occurs in many peoples lives often mistaken for deja vu - where some have enough memory to see the link to the dream. If you are like that... this PDF is invaluable and best of all, 100% free to just download and learn from.
Here is the link: The Theory of Precognitive Dreams
My point, the answers to why law-of-attraction works and why we can have deja vu reside in a much more deeper idea regarding the fundamental nature of reality then what most people are used to. Where precognitive dreaming can be active in accessing/manifesting future events see the pdf. It requires training in lucid dreaming, the ability to navigate the dreamstate and the ability to control dream content.
The Law of Attraction is done when you are awake, it is a thought exercise of focusing your intent for a desired outcome. They have some self-similar properties however in helping someone achieve certain life experiences so in many ways can go hand-in-hand. But enough about precognition and more about the Law of Attraction and Thought Manifestation.
The Law of Attraction works both ways for positive and negative experiences. We all use it on auto-pilot and it's until you start to see results in your own life does it become apparent as in my 2014 Casino exercise that in a directed way positive results can come forward more than the negative.
What I've learned is it's not about trying, forcing, expecting rather the passive qualities of "allowing one-self to experience" is what I find works best for me.
"I am allowing myself to experience what it is like to win at the casino".
"I am allowing myself to experience what it's like to succeed at business."
The next step is visualization, day dreaming of the desired outcome charging it with the allowing, the permission and then finally letting it go so it can manifest.
That in a nutshell is the simplest form of law-of-attraction and thought-manifestation by using intent and visualization. The rest is up to how these are permitted to unfold in the future.
My thoughts on why having other people involved seems to cause more losses. This is just an idea but I think when we are working in this area of belief and thought-manifestation, having another person who may not share that same focus could negate it. We may have individual and group manifestation so if there is discontinuity in the group the effects ground out the intent at the individual level. Some of this idea stems from group events which Dean Radin has studied where in group events changes spike in RNG. Casino's are RNG and if our mass consciousness affects them as per Dean Radin's research this might be why. So I don't object to going at it alone because of this particular possibility. Here is Dean Radin's results with group consciousness affecting RNG patterns: Physical effects of collective attention at Burning Man 2013
Hope you found this article interesting, you have nothing to lose by learning new things about yourself and the best part is... this life learned bit of wisdom is free so just take it and run with it.
If you've had any success with Law-of-attraction, or have precognitive dreams, or have tried my strict casino system and it worked I would love to hear from you. Just e-mail me at: ianwilson27@hotmail.com or visit my website at http://www.youaredreaming.org/
Here is a video where I discuss precognition.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Monday, September 30, 2013
Could Physical Reality really be a Dream?
Could Physical Reality really be a Dream?
Are you having a dream that lasts a lifetime? Can reality be universal dream of a cosmic mind? What if the answer is yes?
If this reality was some type of dream, then there should be some evidence which shows a relationship between the dream world and the waking world. The first red-flag that comes to mind is directly connected to something known as "Precognitive Dreaming". The idea of precognition spans the written record and Aristotle in 350B.C.E wrote a paper entitled, "On Prophesying by Dreams" http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/prophesying.html where he debated the notion that people in his time were describing having these types of dreams.
Edit: Here is an excellent paper written by Timothy Conway that details historical accounts where people through-out the ages have come to this realization: "This is all a Dream [PDF]"
Deja Vu which is a very common type experience which most people have, is a feeling that comes with a type of deja vu aura where new settings, events and circumstances bring a strong sense of familiarity as if you had been there before. What is not so widely known about the deja phenomena is many people link the source of memory which brings about the familiarity to something they dreamed about in the past. For a comprehensive list of precognitive dream types and examples and evidence I recommend reading my paper, "Theory of Precognitive Dreams" which is open source and freely available on-line. Read: Theory of Precognitive Dreams [PDF]
Frequency studies as mentioned in that paper predict statistically that you could already be one of those types of people who already have first-person experiences with dreams that come true. If science can finally answer this age old phenomena of precognitive dreams; then we will see the first use-case where dreams and reality have a relationship which will help reveal this covert relationship between dreams and this reality.
The next red-flag comes from experiments in quantum mechanics which show that our reality is not exactly as physical as we believe it to be. When physicists first discovered particle/wave duality, this caused quite a stir in the physics community. What this means is sub-atomic particles could behave like a wave, or like a particle based on certain conditions.
When an electron is not being measured or observed it creates an interference pattern which is like a ripple in water that creates the wave pattern or interference pattern. When observed it behaves as physical particles.
"Quantum Theory Demonstrated: Observation Affects Reality"
"In a study reported in the February 26 issue of Nature (Vol. 391, pp. 871-874), researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have now conducted a highly controlled experiment demonstrating how a beam of electrons is affected by the act of being observed. The experiment revealed that the greater the amount of "watching," the greater the observer's influence on what actually takes place."Read More: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/02/980227055013.htm
If you thought it was just the sub-atomic particle that behaved this way, an entire molecule of Carbon atoms which form the Carbon-60 molecule known as a buckyball also shows interference patterns.
"Wave-particle duality seen in carbon-60 molecules"
"The Vienna team sent a collimated beam of carbon-60 molecules through a slit made of silicon nitride and detected the interference pattern by ionizing the molecules with a laser and then counting the ions."Read More: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/1999/oct/15/wave-particle-duality-seen-in-carbon-60-molecules
What determines when a particle or atom should be have as a wave-form or a solid state is one of the mind-boggling questions for Physics. One of the answers to this new problem comes from Physicist Tom Campbell who worked for Nasa and the Department of Defence. He describes the collapse of wave-function as a requirement only when the larger-system renders the particle because we exist in a Virtual Reality. His theory which is extensive and covers more than just the virtual reality theory describes that in a virtual reality, the computer doesn't need to render all the data on the hard-drive so to speak, just the data that is being observed. This means when we are observing a moment in time/space only the information required to render out the experience is being rendered into particles. To bring you up to speed on this theory here is a link to his youtube channel and videos. http://www.youtube.com/user/twcjr44
The idea that we are living in a virtual reality is also described by many other mathematicians and physicists such as Nick Bolstrom, Brian Whitworth and Mark Wheeler to name a few. This has spawned a new branch of physics called digital physics and a theory called simulation theory.
For more details I have written an article which covers this in some greater detail called, "Time and space are not what you think." http://you-are-dreaming.blogspot.ca/2013/09/time-and-space-are-not-what-you-think.html
If reality is simply information that is accessed by an observer which in turn a computer-like system then renders that data into particles; were lies the relationship between the observer and the observed in this equation? This brings us back to what dreams are, and how they fit in to this reality system as a whole.
The first idea that must be addressed is the flow of information from the server to the client in a virtual reality. This information is what we call a datastream which is simply information. It is up to the client to process this information and render the data into some meaningful view. If we look at objective reality as information; then this information represents the physical datastream which through our physical senses we download the data, process the data and render a final product of the data in a meaningful view.
This relationship between objective data and our selves as the client observing this data is already self-evident. We may not recognize as the observer how important the mechanics of perception and information processing by the brain is; nor see how fundamental the final rendered product of this information actually is. It's importance in my opinion is beyond the scope of just physical reality and deeply connects to the dreamstate and any other state we may find ourselves in where information is being rendered into a view from any caveat of consciousness in it's many altered states.
Why is it self-evident that you are rendering data from the objective world using your physical senses as the inputs that download this information? If you want to see this in action, close your eyes and the final-product of the mind rendering visual information will stop. Open them again and you will continue to render visual information. Where are you rendering this information is important to understanding this fundamental this final-product of information processing and rendering by the brain actually is.
Unlike a computer which uses a computer screen that provides the feedback of what binary information looks like at the information level, our body does not have a physical computer screen whereby it renders our perception of reality. The brain which is simply a neural network of neurons has to simulate the computer screen in a virtual way.
It's worth mentioning how through the ages philosophers tackled this relationship between what the mind generates and what the observer observes dates back to Plato's Cave analogy. Rene Descartes recognized that the brain preformed some type of pre-processing on sensory input and projected this into some kind of internal screen where a "little man" the homunculus sat in the seat of the soul which resided in the pineal gland, and this has become known as "The Cartesian Theatre". Anthony Peake a British Author further expands this idea into what he calls the "Bohmian IMAX".
In many ways, this internal theatre acts like a holodeck like we see in Star Trek as it simulates 3d space, time and every sensory quality of perception in a meaningful way. This doesn't mean however that every detail exactly represents what is out there in the objective datastream. Our senses are very limited and the brain does fill in the blanks as is evident by this simple optical illusion provided in this link: http://gifs.gifbin.com/052012/1337880361_ugly_celebrities_optical_illusion.gif
These subjective differences in how the brain processes sensory information is evident in how a colour blind person perceives the objective data which would appear different to a person who is not colour blind. These subjective qualities are also recognized as something called, "Qualia" or the experience of reality but does not imply what the experience is as having total objectivity. This is likely why some people prefer chocolate ice-cream and others vanilla. Why some like country music and others prefer classical rock. How we perceive our reality is filtered and rendered subjectively; what that implies is that we only see is our experience of reality in a filtered down little-world view.
That doesn't mean it completely omits what is out there in the objective datastream; our brain does an amazing job of putting all that information together in a very close approximation. If it didn't we would likely never be able to drive cars en mass as everyone would be crashing and causing all sorts of mayhem. We wouldn't have accurate measurements down to the micron because what we do have in terms of resolution and is a very close approximation of that objective data.
Again, if you feel that you are not simply observing an experience of reality in this Cartesian Theatre simply close your eyes and it will become very apparent that what you are experiencing is a mind-generated rendering, a final product based on information processing and data inputs through the physical body. Thus we see the client (you and your body) and the server (objective reality) in terms of a metaphorical relationship.
How does dreaming stack up in terms of datastreams and information processing? Is there a relationship between the Cartesian Theatre and how our dream content is rendered? The answer in my opinion is again self-evident that when we are asleep and dreaming, the content of the dream is also rendering on the same Cartesian Theatre that our sensory-perceptions when we are awake are rendering on.
What is interesting to note with dreams however is the dream datastream. What is programming and encoding this datastream? What are the inputs downloading that data? We already know where that data is being rendered so we need to look closer at the first two questions.
Dream content is mind-generated meaning many unconscious processes are involved directly linked to you, and your own consciousness whereby what you think during a dream; renders out into a view on the Cartesian Theatre. Dreams themselves when we are actively having them often appear as real as our waking life. For most people, they do not realize they were actually in a dream until they wake up.
This is not an uncommon occurrence for most people. Dreams can translate into spectacular virtual reality simulations rich with both content and sensory feedback. They can appear physical and solid. You can simulate sight, hearing, touch and even taste and smell during a dream. Hot/Cold and pain can also be experienced during a dream depending on how sensory aware you are during them.
Like cheat-codes in computer games, lucid dreamers can experience "God" mode where the dream content doesn't hurt them, or "no-clipping" mode where they can pass through walls and objects in the dream state. Just an interesting observation and fun to note for you gamers out there.
For a more comprehensive look at dreaming, I've also written a free e-book entitled, "You Are Dreaming" which you can freely download here: You Are Dreaming Free eBook [PDF]
In understanding that a dream reality is a virtual reality created by a system of consciousness, it is also important to note that you are that system of consciousness that is creating your dream content. It's prudent to dismiss yourself as the director of your dream content assuming you lack the aptitude to control your dreams. It's more important to note that you may just be in the passenger's seat of your unconscious processes rather in the driver's seat which is why lucid dreaming becomes vital for better dream control and exploration.
What we do know about dreams is the fact they can be very real when we have them, and the reasons for that can be directly linked to how information is processed and rendered on this Cartesian Theatre. Both dreams and reality render there, and both offer unique experiences directly related to you, the observer.
If we examine dreams, there is another self-evident fact regarding what programs the dream and also what the dream content is rendered as. We know that every detail from light, colour, sound and objects including 3d space itself in a dream is the final rendering of information processing. Unlike atoms and Boson's dreams content is made up of a more fundamental rudimentary "bit", and that "bit" is thought. Thought is the programming language of dreams and is the most fundamental component of that system. If physical reality is simply a much larger dream at a Universal scale then it would also hold true that thought programs the objective datastream as well.
Which makes thought very important for both objective reality and dreams so raising some conjecture regarding this topic is very important to understanding some deep underlying mechanics of reality as a whole. Fortunately, there are some simple self-evident exercises that can help you see thought in action as to how it programs the Cartesian Theatre and how the Theatre simply responds to thought in the most profound way.
When we often think of thought, we associate it to the inner-voice which represents our inner-monologue which is a sub-vocalization in our conditioned language. When you read this text you should have a faint auditory sound of your voice reading out each word. This is thought in the form of sound providing feedback on your Cartesian Theatre.
When you imagine an apple for example with your eyes closed. The visual image of an apple will appear on this canvas in a faint way. The more you relax and focus on this visual form of thinking, the more contrast and resolution will occur and the image can become much more vivid and crisp.
This ability to think in sensory forms is not limited to just sound and thought. You can apply the same attention-focusing techniques to taste, touch and smell. This is most evident when you are falling asleep and the dream starts to take shape. Dreams simply perfect in action how our thoughts form complex sensory feedback on the Cartesian Theatre. This is very self-evident for lucid dreamers or people who pay attention to their thoughts when falling asleep.
This more advance sensory-form of thinking is a type of language. A form of non-verbal communication between aspects of yourself. Sigmund Freud recognized that our consciousness was compartmentalized and composed of what he felt was the id, ego, super-ego and unconscious. How these parts communicate amongst themselves is related to these variances in verbal and non-verbal communication. You already see in action how these systems work to produce very elaborate dreams during sleep.
What if this network of consciousness of which we are a part of extends to the Universe itself? Some kind of cosmic mind whereby we are all individual parts; yet still connected? How would this larger part communicate to it's smaller parts? How would the smaller parts interpret that language and communication?
Through precognitive dreams for those of you who have them, you are already seeing in action how a dream, which is composed entirely of thought represents a future event. When the dream actualizes the dream seems to materialize as an event in objective reality. For those of you who do not, well that missing ingredient is very helpful in understanding this covert relationship between thought and the reality it creates.
This possibility that physical reality could also be derived from dreaming or thought is not a new idea. The question really remains if it's true, how do you see this within your own experiences? And if you can accept that possibility... what next?
Many of these ideas are either touched on or expanded on in the following abstract and book:
Abstract: Theory of Precognitive Dreams [PDF]
Book: You Are Dreaming [PDF]
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Time and Space are not what you think!
To better understand why Time and Space may be completely different then our current view we must start at particle/wave duality. For those of you who do not know what particle/wave duality is. It is an observed effect in Quantum Mechanics where sub-atomic particles and atoms behave either as wave-forms or form solid particles under certain conditions.
This was brought to light with the double-slit experiment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment and has baffled some of the greatest minds in Physics ever since.
In 1999 more research proved that larger atoms like Carbon-60 the molecules they form known as buckyballs also show particle/wave duality which means entire atoms AND molecules exist as a wave-function and collapse into a physical particle.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/1999/oct/15/wave-particle-duality-seen-in-carbon-60-molecules
Most physicists don't understand why this is; but the answer changes everything we know about reality being a "physical world" as these experiments are proving that physicality only happens under observation and measurement.
It is this paradox in atomic behaviours between the quantum and macro world which is revealing that reality could be something else, it could be digital information.
Physicist Tom Campbell describes the wave-function state as a probability distribution that collapses into solid particles when the "system" renders the information. He states implicitly that we all exist in a virtual reality.
And he's not alone. Other Mathematicians and Physicists are coming to this conclusion such as Brian Whitworth, Nick Bolstrom and many others. There is even a branch of physics that is gaining a stronger reputation called Digital Physics and new theories about the cosmos called Simulation Theory because mathematically this is far more supported and likely that reality is a digital information system that is rendering; than an actual physical material world.
If this is true, then time and space likely do not exist as we believe. In a virtual reality, time is simply a refresh rate between frames being rendered by a cosmic computer.
Space is then a mathematical illusion of vector calculations that simulates space only; but the distance between things at the information level can have very little space if any at all.
If this were true, then the same particle could exist in two places in space at the same time; as space is simply a Cartesian mathematical simulation. We could literally have one particle in two locations in space at the same time.
This also means, we are all likely existing in a much smaller Universe than we see represented in the mathematical simulation of the physical universe. In many respects, we could all be existing in the event horizon of a Singularity, and in the Singularity.
This is also known as the Holographic Principle which suggests our Universe is a hologram with supporting mathematics.
It is very likely at some point where science in the main stream will announce that reality is a simulation simply because the evidence that this is so presents itself in quantum mechanics and heavily supported much better than a physical system by mathematics.
Welcome to the Singularity.
Here is an excellent interview with Dean Radin and Tom Campbell discussing much of the above:
This is another video which describes the double-slit related to virtual reality theory.
Articles and Papers
This is an experiment where the same entangled photon is measured over a distance of 10 miles and theoretically effect can happen over light-years.
http://news.discovery.com/tech/gear-and-gadgets/teleportation-quantum-mechanics.htm
This is the UCAL resonator which scales up quantum effect into the macro world producing a switch that is both ON and OFF at the SAME time.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7289/full/nature08967.html
Physicists To Test If Universe Is A Computer Simulation
Huffington Post UK | By Michael Rundle
"Physicists have devised a new experiment to test if the universe is a computer.
A philosophical thought experiment has long held that it is more likely than not that we're living inside a machine.
The theory basically goes that any civilisation which could evolve to a 'post-human' stage would almost certainly learn to run simulations on the scale of a universe. And that given the size of reality - billions of worlds, around billions of suns - it is fairly likely that if this is possible, it has already happened."
Read More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/12/12/physicists-universe-simulation-test-university-of-washington-matrix_n_2282745.html?utm_hp_ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false
Visit my website at: http://www.youaredreaming.org/
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
The Theory of Precognitive Dreams
The paper described and categorizes precognitive dream experience into lower-order and higher-order groups, provides compelling research and evidence in favor of precognition, details how to lucid dream and explore this particular experience in first-person and provides theory as to why it occurs.
This should prove to be a valuable asset for those of you who have this experience and insightful for those who do not.
Here is the link for the paper. If you like, please share as it's public domain.
http://www.youaredreaming.org/assets/pdf/Theory_Of_Precognitive_Dreams.pdf
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
The Dream that Saved My Life
That dream came in October 2012 when in the dream, I was driving my car and turned down a snow covered hill. It was virgin snow, no cars had been down this route and was dark. My daughter was in the back seat of the car. The hill ended at a T section and when I tried to stop, the snow covered hill revealed that underneath the snow was black ice. The car slid through the stop sign and a white truck smashed the driver side door. I woke up in shock at the literal realism and details of the dream.
Having had many precognitive dreams in the past, and the fact this concerned my daughter I reconsidered what tires I had set out for the winter. I had two winter tires and two all seasons that got me through the last winter just fine. Until the dream, changing this tire set wasn't an option. However, reviewing the details of the dream I couldn't dismiss the foreboding sense of doom that it conveyed. After speaking about it with my mother, I opted to buy 4 brand new winter tires and have them studded just in case this dream was precognitive.
What made this interesting is where I live studs are not a requirement and the Walmart clerk certainly made it known that I shouldn't waste my time on having studs put on the tire. He showed me several different brands and I kept insisting on the best winters that supported studs. Finally in the end, I had the tires I wanted.
It would be the first winter in 24 years of driving that I would put studded winter tires on my car.
That winter, I was house sitting to avoid a commute between cities for work. Having my daughter I set out early to her day care and took an alternate route. It was a fresh snowfall and I took a the back-roads concerned that the highway driving might be too dangerous having had some close calls on the first day of snow in the past.
On the back route however, I was the only car that had driven as no other tracks were present. Making a right on the only hill that connects to where my destination was, I was suddenly confronted with the same scenario that I had previously dreamt.
By the time I remembered the dream, it was at the same spot where I started braking to stop on the hill. Like the dream foretold, there was black ice under the road and even with the studded winter tires, the car slid horribly and I panicked. Uncertain if I could even stop, I started to honk the horn to warn on coming traffic. Fortunately, the studs were digging into the black ice and when I was about a foot past the stop sign, the car stopped. Just as the white truck drove full speed less than a foot in front of me.
This certainly has made me grateful for these kinds of dreams and now, I can honestly say I owe precognitive dreaming my life. When my daughter grows up uninjured and still has a father, she can be thankful I changed the outcome of the dream by simply changing a set of tires. A life saving choice anyway you look at it.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Person Accurately Predicts Japan Earthquake on a Forum!
This is a very compelling example of a precognitive dream. You may want to read my abstract to find more info on precognition: Precognitive Dream Abstract
“Last night, I had a brief dream in which I saw a map of the USGS world view (which I do check on and off)
On it I saw a LARGE RED sqaure surrounded by many other smaller squares just of the east coast of Japan. The thing was this square was much larger than the normal size square USGS put up for a 7+”
If you follow the link and read the post you will see the time stamp. What makes this really compelling is it accurately predicts the magnitude, location and details of the Japan earthquake a Month before it happens.
This is yet another classic example of precognitive dreams in my opinion.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Updated Revised Abstract
http://www.youaredreaming.org/assets/pdf/deja_reve.pdf
Enjoy the new version and any feedback is welcomed!
Cheers,
Ian
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Déjà Vu or Déjà Rêvé?
Here is an abstract that I have written on “Déjà Vu or Déjà Rêvé?”
Abstract
This paper examines the very real phenomena of Déjà Vu and how it connects to an even more profound subtype known as Déjà Rêvé. Déjà vu is French for “Already Seen” and Déjà Rêvé is French for “Already Dreamed”. Often people who experience Déjà Vu link the origin of the familiar memory to something they have dreamed days, weeks, months and even years before they experienced “Déjà Vu”. Déjà Rêvé suggests that dreams have a direct and relative relationship with physical reality. If so, then understanding and exploring this is critical to science and critical to understanding the origins of “reality”.
Feel free to comment on this abstract.
Happy Dreaming!
Ian Wilson
Sunday, August 29, 2010
August 29th, 2010 - Non-lucids.
All HTML Tags must be stripped from this text. Encoded in ASCII.
[Header]
Date: August 29th, 2010
Time: 7:30am
Author: Ian Andrew Wilson
E-mail: ianwilson27@hotmail.com
Blog: you-are-dreaming.blogspot.com
Copyright: Public Domain by author 2010. Free for public use.
[Disclaimer]
This is an ongoing personal investigation into precognitive dream potential. In no way is the information contained in this article claiming to be psychic or precognitive in nature. Not all textual translations of a dream can clearly depict the vast dream imagery and symbolism and what may be condensed down to a line of text could represent a largely descriptive visual dream environment. Low-order spelling and grammatical errors are expected as the material is written quickly and right after waking up from sleep. This text shall remain unchanged from the time it was posted, and should rehash into the MD5 code outside of the MD5 tags. In the future should any of the dream context match a real-life event the author will attempt to capture images or articles and describe how these events interconnect with the context within the dream.
All persons, characters and events contained in this article are as they appeared from within a dream, any similarities to public officials or people is completely coincidence and is not meant to reflect this person or persons in any way.
[Journal Entry]
Dream 1: I am with my father at his place in NV. There is a social gathering with a few people from his Church. We are talking about the "truth" and I am listening. His guests leave and I go to mix a rum and coke, but there is no more coke left. I decide that I don't want to drink and head off to bed.
I have a dream within the dream where I am now living out in the wilderness with a group of survivors. We have compound bows and are off hunting for deer. We walk through forest as well as follow a road. At on point we come to a dugout that has been well setup. One of the group members investigates it and the others keep moving onwards in the hunt.
I stay back and wait with the guy. Then the owner of the dugout comes back and sees us, he's not to happy about us being there but we haven't really disturbed anything. He has a bow armed and pointed at us, we talk with him and he relaxes. He tells us it's pretty stupid to be in someone elses encampment that he could have shot us had he not suspected that we were nice.
We talk for a bit and he turns and shoots at a bird and nisses with his bow. He wants to take us to this old abandoned building that he says they have setup as kind of a base camp. We walk with him to this abandoned town. We walk through a steel door into a spider ridden corridor, I don't like the spiders and use a kids toy to bat down any webs in my way.
We walk into an open area, it's damp and dirty. For some reason I have two scorpions with me, one with claws and the other without. I am protecting the one scorpion with-out claws from the one with claws. The one with claws goes to close to the other one and I push it away. It get's aggressive and stings my knee. I then smack it out of the way. Apparently they are not venomous and I don't worry about the sting.
Dream 2: I am with some guy that I don't know. He kind of has long dark brown hair, in his 30's and kind of rock-starish. He is definately in a band, there are photos of him. He kind of reminds me of Chris Angel in appearance, but isn't that person. We are driving in his truck and are going to a party. We get to a house with other people and start there.
There are a couple of people sitting on a couch when we get inside. The kitchen table has lots of different alchohol to mix drinks with. There is a woman there who is quite skinny, has freckles and her teeth are a bit on the stained side. She is talking with this guy and they seem to be hitting it off. She has to be in her early twenties or even very late teens 19-21 and I think she's way to young for this guy but it's not my business and I go in the living room.
The guy's on the couch are being funny and cracking rude jokes. They are making fun of some one's wife saying she is a whore because she's slept with everyone in the room. I say she is like a moss covered cavern, you don't realize how big it is until you get inside. They laugh, we are quite silly. There is a piano there and I sit down and start playing it. They are happy I play the piano, but I tell them I don't and crunch out a few really lame attempts at music. I warm up a bit and play something more musical.
The guy wants to go and drive to a pub. He's taking me and this girl who must be his GF. We go to the truck and I wake up.
Codes:
TTB: Time-To-Bed: The time the author went to bed.
TA: Time-Awake: The time the author woke up.
T2S: Time-To-Sleep: Estimated time it took to fall asleep.
TTS: Total-Time-Slept: Estimated time of sleep.
ETID: Estimated-Time-In-Dream: Estimated sense of time as it passed in the dream.
<-- END MD5 ENCRYPTION -->
MD5 Checksum: c57b4f0477cf612dbe85ff8512e0c151
Encrypted online at: http://md5-hash-online.waraxe.us/
Download Plain-text Version: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B9w6moQJPZJuMTg5M2MzODEtMmVmMy00NTZmLWIyYTUtMWQyNDY4N2FhMmRi&sort=name&layout=list&num=50
Saturday, August 28, 2010
August 28th, 2010 - Non-Lucid but lasted what seemed like 2 weeks.
All HTML Tags must be stripped from this text. Encoded in ASCII.
[Header]
Date: August 28th, 2010
Time: 7:00am
Author: Ian Andrew Wilson
E-mail: ianwilson27@hotmail.com
Blog: you-are-dreaming.blogspot.com
Copyright: Public Domain by author 2010. Free for public use.
[Disclaimer]
This is an ongoing personal investigation into precognitive dream potential. In no way is the information contained in this article claiming to be psychic or precognitive in nature. Not all textual translations of a dream can clearly depict the vast dream imagery and symbolism and what may be condensed down to a line of text could represent a largely descriptive visual dream environment. Low-order spelling and grammatical errors are expected as the material is written quickly and right after waking up from sleep. This text shall remain unchanged from the time it was posted, and should rehash into the MD5 code outside of the MD5 tags. In the future should any of the dream context match a real-life event the author will attempt to capture images or articles and describe how these events interconnect with the context within the dream.
All persons, characters and events contained in this article are as they appeared from within a dream, any similarities to public officials or people is completely coincidence and is not meant to reflect this person or persons in any way.
[Journal Entry]
I worked nearly all evening of August 27th so no dream entry if you wondering where it is. I have a project deadline so I am working in favor of sleeping that said, even with a great reducting of sleep (3-4 hours) today's dream set out to make sure I had lots of dreamtime.
Dream 1: This is yet another classic example of time being stretched in a dream. The dream lasted what felt like weeks, I was uninterrupted from the sleep and woke up with so much memory it was hard to sort out just how long I was in this dream. I was going to University, living a totally different life then the one I live now. By the start of the dream, I had a 30 day rent free eviction notice and by the time I woke up I had 15 days left so the dream suggests 2 weeks and a day of time.
I simply do not have the time to write this all down, I am being pressured to get a really urgent project finished this weeked, but will give a summary of experience.
I would go to school, sit in classes, walk around the University. I drove there and liked to park on the 6th floor because it had nice elevator access and usually didn't have cars parked there when I got there. I was spending lot's of time at my girlfriends house. However, I would be at my house throught the dream. I was deffinately waking up and sleeping in the dream. Even my memories of myself (which clearly are not linked to my real waking life) suggested a whole alternate life I had lived suggesting this was like a probable life.
Lot's of partying and drinking with the girlfriend and her roomates. By week two I was concidering moving into a spare room at their house but the non-stop partying concerned me because it was affecting my schoolwork. There was also a river that ran near the University and had a nice concrete bridge to walk over. I remembered being concerned about being robbed there at night. Not sure what the name of the University was, I knew in the dream. What is also interesting to note, while in the dream all the memories and experiences seem to just sit there active, when waking up it's like they detach and remain in that dreamed of focus state.
I was friends with one of my professors, and my courses where all subjects that seemed to suggest I was into socialology, psychology, English. None of which really seemed to match events in waking life but seemed as real and meaningful to me there as it would to me as awake. The other interesting thing was zero interst in dreaming. I didn't care about them at all. No meantion of them to friends, no memory of even liking them. Who ever I was in this dream had a very boring, mundane existence and liked Sports! Lot's of time at sports pubs watching Rugby, Soccer and just loving them at a level that I simply do not in real life. I enjoy a little bit of sports, but in this dream I was a fanatic about them. I remember someone in a wheel-chair who I was also friends with. He was on the elevator with me at one point.
I was really into my Girlfriend, she was a big distraction because every chance I could get, I would be with her. She liked to party and have me hang out with her at her place as much as possible. She had long light-brown hair, was very skinny and small breasted. Her namy could have been Susan, I think I called her 'Suzy' but this is very vague now the sharp focused and coherent memories while in the dream are now totally cut off. I know she was totally down with having me live there but I was also worried about what my mother would think if she found out. I was obviously away from home living in some town far away from family.
Now that I am awake and in my real life. There are all sorts of memory shifts that I think are really critical to make note of more so then the dream content.
1.) In the dream, I had full knowledge of streets, buildings, people's names. I would see and recognize a person, know their name and have memory of our history together. Exactly like I would in waking life, however... all those connective memories that suggest an entire life and past are totally cut off when my waking life memories that exist much in the same way are now relevant to this life. It is like the focus state in the dream allowed for a totally different memory bank by which to draw relevant experience from (for that dream character only). The whole time in that long dream I had not remembered a single detail from my waking life, in fact... I have no way to affirm if that was even me in my waking life and not a totally different person. I can argue that based on personality, interests and likes... the person has nothing to do with how I am in waking life.
I was also a lot younger too, in the dream I must have been 19-20 years of age. All the partying, eating out, messy apartment and attitude are very clear on it.
2.) When I wake up, all that sense of time quickly compresses as the connective focus to that dream collapses and memory that existed in relevant areas of my mind are flushed out by the relative waking life memories. It is hard to explain but imagine replacing all your history and expeirences with another life during the dream, totally detached from this life, and when waking up you watch a whole tunnel of experience and memory just disintegrate into irrelevancy.
3.) The more time in waking life, the less sense-of-time remains of that dream. It becomes now faded, translucent and names, details that are left-brain centric are replaced with just images and feelings. Needless to say, while in the dream I was locked in there for what seemed like weeks and when waking up I actually felt a little exhausted and disorientated when the personality of that dream was flushed.
TTB: 4:30am TA: 6:50am TTS: ~20m TTS: ~2h ETID: 2 weeks suggested by dream. ~12h or more when waking up sorting out time with what is left of memory.
The ETID is really hard to estimate on this dream, the nature of it had so much memory, time and expeirences that it really felt like weeks however the actual end of the dream when waking up had the strongest sense of time. With collapse of dream into waking it's like an elastic band that has been stretched suddenly snapping back into a shorter period like at least 12h or more more of actual memory that pulls from the dream. Then I can get into a new pocked of memory, and hours seem to be there. Very strange the way memory affects sense-of-time after waking up from these very long dreams.
Codes:
TTB: Time-To-Bed: The time the author went to bed.
TA: Time-Awake: The time the author woke up.
T2S: Time-To-Sleep: Estimated time it took to fall asleep.
TTS: Total-Time-Slept: Estimated time of sleep.
ETID: Estimated-Time-In-Dream: Estimated sense of time as it passed in the dream.
<-- END MD5 ENCRYPTION -->
MD5 Checksum: 607d9faa6db53707d8b9722579726aee
Encrypted online at: http://md5-hash-online.waraxe.us/
Download Plain-text Version: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B9w6moQJPZJuNmI0NzFkNTItNGExZi00ZTNjLWE5MmQtMzNiMzFlYWU1ZjYx&sort=name&layout=list&num=50

